Deepwater Horizon
November 15, 2012 by Deepwater

What is the total oil spillage for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill?

On 20th of April 2010, the day when the tragic Deepwater Horizon oil spill took place, it is believed that more than 4.9 million barrels of oil escaped from the well. The accident happened in the Gulf of Mexico and it is also known as the BP oil disaster. The cause of this disaster was a blowout of the wellhead, and the damages in human lives include 11 dead workers on the well and 17 other men injured from the accident.

 

What is the total oil spillage for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill?

 

Unfortunately for the marine habitat and also for the health of the inhabitants near the Gulf of Mexico, the well stayed open for more than 3 months, spilling oil and making life difficult for all the environment around it. After the first release of crude oil in a huge quantity of 780,000 cubic meters, the well continued to release oil daily.

Right after the accident, the same well released around 62,000 barrels of oil in a day, and since it has decreased, for an estimated quantity of 53,000 barrels each day. The reason for the decreasing is the depletion of the hydrocarbons which were entertaining the reservoir, in a gradual way.

The total loss of the oil in the ocean was about 5 million barrels until the leak was eventually capped, between April 20 and July 15. According to a Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution study, not only oil was spilled after the explosion, but also natural gas. With 100 million standard cubic feet release every day, the Deepwater Horizon explosion was qualified as the biggest and largest oil spill in the waters of the United States of America.

What is the total oil spillage for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill?

The area affected by the oil is also one of the largest in the history of marine accidents, and it covered from 2,500 square miles to 68,000 square miles. Even the people around the Gulf of Mexico could feel the secondary effects of the spelling, and the economies of the neighboring cities affected as well, in the negative sense.

The well, however, has been officially sealed only 4 months later, in 19 September 2010, when no other, and ever since the wheel stopped releasing oil or gas. The damages have yet to be paid for, but in the near future it should all come together, and this incident could be left behind, but never forgotten.Hor

 

  •   •   •   •   •
November 15, 2012 by Deepwater

Do you think we should have more regulations or fewer regulations for energy companies?

 

In a world that has been affected by different types of energy sources being the cause of global warming and the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, it makes sense that energy companies are being clamped down on and more regulations put in place.  It doesn’t matter which country, you are from it cannot hurt to have new rules and regulations added and tightened as I was reading today about the Electricity Commission of New Zealand changing their electricity regulations in order to prevent a crisis or a repeat of a bad situation from occurring again within their energy companies specifically Mercury Energy.

Do you think we should have more regulations or fewer regulations for energy companies?

 I think it is the right thing as someone who has participated in the writing of a crisis communication/ contingency plan; the number one thing besides having a back-up plan is that you wish to ensure that it does not happen ever again. Imagine if you ask a room of full Americans, how many of them wanted to see a repeat of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill re-occur – would anyone put up their hands? Most likely they wouldn’t as it was recorded as the worst oil catastrophe recorded in the history of America.  So if the option was to tighten the regulations towards the energy companies in order not to have another oil spill to occur, I would want that to happen – I would be the one to vote for more regulations as it is better to be safe and have rules in place, than be sorry and realize that you had the chance to stand up and do something about the spill. You could have voted and stood by the agreement of having more regulations for the energy companies, not least.

Do you think we should have more regulations or fewer regulations for energy companies?

So readers, what would you choose and when making your decision, take a long hard think about your children’s and their children’s futures and think what the world would be like if you chose one or the other?

 

  •   •   •   •   •
November 15, 2012 by Deepwater

Why did Obama send nuclear scientists to solve an oil problem?

 

When an oil spill occurs, you automatically assume that the scientists to solve the situation and in case the problem behind the oil would be biologists as they focus with the environment but no, it seems that President Barack Obama had different ideas and went and hired nuclear scientists to solve the oil problem. This stumped many people, but there must have been a reason on why President Obama decided to go with nuclear scientists over biologists

Why did Obama send nuclear scientists to solve an oil problem?

Nuclear scientists were called to the incident as sheens of oil were reported causing effects of toxicity in the water and causing those surrounding the infected oil spill areas to show symptoms of sicknesses. Fisherman also reported like on The Simpsons, the sea creatures e.g. fish and shrimp were starting to display signs of genetic mutation. What kind of chemical nuclear reaction is bubbling under the surface of the Gulf of Mexico?

President Obama sent the nuclear scientists to make sure that the sheen and chemicals would not be harmful to the sea life as well as harmful to the water supply and cause illnesses to those who live in surrounding areas near the infected site in the Gulf of Mexico.

Why did Obama send nuclear scientists to solve an oil problem?

It was seen as the right thing to do, to hire Nuclear scientists as they knew exactly what chemicals they were looking for and they knew what ways could solve the problem or what in fact caused the reactor whereas biologists would have focused more on the effect of the oil on the environment rather than the big picture of toxicity.

Personally, speaking I agree with President Obama’s response as I would have rather called the nuclear scientists in and then find out that nothing is wrong rather than the other option of non-heritage and discovered that America had a bigger problem on their hands than ever imagined in the Gulf of Mexico. Afterall the nuclear scientists are best equipped professionally with required experience to sela with such sisasterous situations which can effect a large populace including the flaura and fauna.

 

  •   •   •   •   •
November 15, 2012 by Deepwater

Do Liberals know that Obama administration waived safety checks for Deepwater Horizon in 2009?

 

With an election year looming and the race between the president Barack Obama and Mitt Romney is the closest it has been brought to the public’s and especially those that follow the Liberal party philosophies that the Obama administration was responsible for waiving safety checks for the BP contracted rig that the Switzerland company Transocean owned.  That rig was Deepwater Horizon, the rig that was responsible for spilling hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Do Liberals know that Obama administration waived safety checks for Deepwater Horizon in 2009?

Saying this however, it wasn’t apparently the first time that the Obama administration has waived safety checks for rigs wanting to go offshore and begin new drilling projects. Before a rig can go out drilling it needs to pass a number of safety and regulation checks and from then on, it needs to undergo monthly safety checks for the first 40 months which equivalents to the first three years of the rigs operation.  Out of the three years of safety checks that were supposed to take place on the Deepwater Horizon it seems that approx… 25% of safety checks were nowhere to be found and eventually were discovered that they had not even occurred.

Do Liberals know that Obama administration waived safety checks for Deepwater Horizon in 2009?

Scarily enough, it seems that the oil ship Deepwater Horizon was not the only drilling ship to have its safety checks waived as it turns out the Obama administration has been responsible for waiving another twenty-six new offshore drilling projects.  One of the reasons that the Obama administration have given for their comment is that the ships have been given an exemption as they do not represent those ships and oil rigs that need the final stamp of approval for drilling operations. However, one more argument exists and that is the need with USA to develop its own oil reserve to meet its ever growing need of oil. At the same time the sensitivity of the political uncertainty related to the Iran issue, also make it necessary for Americal to develop its own oil fields to the extent possible. That urgency sometimes is in the core for the Governments to be relaxed of safety issues. But the high price that has to be paid in such a situation has become crealy visible in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon spill. 

  •   •   •   •   •
November 15, 2012 by Deepwater

How common are rigged/platform explosions?

 

As our world starts to fall into more warnings of global warming and natural disasters, it makes you wonder whether the next big bad thing will be the oil that is turning the world towards the end,  as is evidenced in the oil spill in New Zealand a year ago in October 2011. Another case was the  biggest oil spill recorded in American history – the 2010 oil spill caused by a Transocean ship called Deepwater Horizon who was drilling in deep water (up to 5000 ft deep) when the rig caught fire and caught fire in the Gulf of Mexico and thereby taking lives of 11 workers on the rig and spewing millions of oil into the Gulf badly damaging the environment.

How common are rigged/platform explosions?

Ironically it was recorded that the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico happened to sink on Earth Day 2010 and was an example of both human and environmental tragedies.  So how common are oil rig/platform explosions? According to an article written on Yahoo News on April 23 2010, oil rig blowouts are quite a common occurrence, which could explain why those who work on the oil rigs and in the mines earn quite a good wage.  An AP report cites that a federal Minerals Management System service report stated that since 2001, a total of 858 explosions and fires have been reported on oil rigs.

However, it is rare to have major oil explosions like the one happened in the Gulf of Mexico as the MMS reported that in the first five months of 2009, they had reported 39 fires or explosions. So, such incidents are quite common.

How common are rigged/platform explosions?

No matter how much safety measures are taken but still, working as a driller on an offshore rig involved inoil and gas exploration is undoubtedly one of the most risky professions in USA. The risks are not east to avoid and workers are on shifts for an long working hours, mostly more than 12 hrs a day. The required uniform of hard hats and steel boots are not so safe as they look as it was recorded by the Bureau of Labor Statistics that 21 people were killed in the oil and gas extraction industry in 10-11 which includes mainly the accidents on the offshore oil rigs. 

 

  •   •   •   •   •